|
USP
797 INDEX
Preparations:
Are
you prepared?
USP 797 Training
Solutions:
USP 797 Compliance
Solutions
On-Site
USP 797
Gap Analysis Request
Opinions:
Micro-Clean's
Position
on US 797
Sterile Preparations Documents:
USP 797 Pharmaceutical
Compounding – Sterile Preparations
JCAHO
Timeline
USP 797 Compliance
Resources
Supplies & Equipment:
USP
797 Supplies & Equipment
|
UPDATE
OF USP 797 DOCUMENT
http://www.usp.org/standards/proposed797Revisions.html
Pharmaceutical Compounding – Sterile
Preparations
This proposed document was compiled by Dr. David W. Newton.
Dr. Newton is chairman of the 2000-2005 Sterile Compounding Committee,
SCC, of the Council of Experts of the United States Pharmacopeial Convention,
Inc., USP. The complete text of the proposed revisions to <797>
are also summarized in future publication of IJPC and the full proposed
text of <797> will be published in a future 2005 issue of USP's
bimonthly official journal, Pharmacopeial Forum, PF. Comments on this
summarized proposal should be directed to Dr. Claudia Okeke at cco@usp.org.
Please continue to check our website for the date of publication of
the full text in PF.
Dr. Newton and Mr. Lawrence A. Trissel, an SCC member,
authored a description of the history and rationale of <797>,
and USP process in the July/August 2004 IJPC.1
Introduction
When <797> was introduced officially in the 27th
Revision of the United States Pharmacopeia, USP 27, on January 1, 2004,2,a
it became enforceable by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. It has
since been adopted by some pharmacy regulatory and accrediting bodies,
especially some U.S. state boards of pharmacy, and the Joint Commission
on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations, JCAHO. As of January
1, 2005, USP 28 is the official source of <797>.3,a
In 2004 on May 14-15, August 6-7, and November
12-13, the USP conducted packaging and compounding workshops in Rockville
and Gaithersburg, MD, for which total attendance was approximately 400-500
persons; mostly hospital pharmacists. The predominant audience interest
was asking questions related to <797>, which were addressed by
SCC members, Dr. Samuel Augustine, Dr. Newton, and Mr. Trissel; Dr.
Darryl Rich of JCAHO; and Mr. Eric Kastango, a private pharmacist consultant.
Hundreds of questions and comments about <797> were raised at
those three workshops, and emailed to USP before and after them. The
SCC met October 13-14, 2004, during and within five weeks following
which it approved the proposed revisions to <797> that are summarized
here.
Summary of USP Revision
Process
The process to create or revise USP content, which includes
opportunity for public involvement, is described in the front pages
of each bimonthly issue of USP's official journal, Pharmacopeial Forum,
PF. Following is a four-step outline of this process as it applies to
<797>:
- The SCC considers internal (from USP volunteers
and staff) and external (from public sources, "PF provides interested
parties an opportunity to review and comment...") comments.
- A draft containing both current official content
and proposed revisions is published in PF.
- A period of several weeks elapses for opportunity
to receive public comments.
- The SCC reviews received comments, then determines
whether additional revision is necessary before the next version is
published in PF as an Interim Revision Announcement, IRA, which bears
a date for official USP adoption.
The cycle of steps 1-4 may be repeated; thus, one
or more years could elapse between currently official <797> in
USP 28 and the next official <797>. The next official <797>
will appear either in an annual USP revision, e.g., USP 29 in 2006,
or in one of the two semiannual supplements to each annual USP revision.
The earliest possibility, but an unlikely probability, would be Supplement
2 to USP 28 in late 2005.
Summary of Proposed
Revisions to <797>
The revisions to <797> proposed by the SCC
during and following the October 13-14, 2004 SCC meeting are condensed
in Table 1 (content that is not in <797> in USP 27 and USP 28)
and Table 2. These tables are intended to succinctly present the substantive
changes in practice standards and important clarifications in the proposed
revisions. The <797> section titles and (locations) of proposed
revisions are centered in Arial font, under which the proposed revisions
are denoted by squares, . The proposed revisions in both tables are
listed in order of their occurrence in <797>. With selected proposed
revisions, there is some explanation in [brackets], which will not appear
in <797>.
|
Table
1. New Definitions and Standards Proposed for USP Chapter <797>. |
Definitions
(at end of INTRODUCTION)
- PREPARATION. A preparation,
or compounded sterile preparation, CSP, is a sterile drug or nutrient
prepared in a licensed pharmacy or other health care related facility
pursuant to the order of a licensed prescriber, which may or may
not contain sterile products.
- PRODUCT. A product is a
commercially manufactured sterile drug or nutrient that has been
evaluated for safety and efficacy by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,
FDA. Products are accompanied by full prescribing information,
which is commonly known as the FDA-approved manufacturer's labeling
or product package insert.
|
Immediate
Use Exemption from ISO Class 5
(after Low-Risk Conditions- within the Low-Risk Level CSPs section)
- Three or fewer sterile products may be prepared
in worse than ISO Class 5 air when there is no direct contact
contamination, and administration begins within 1 hour and is
completed within 12 hours of preparation.[This exemption has been
honored by the JCAHO in 2004].
|
Proprietary
Bag and Vial Systems
(after Immediate Use Exemption from ISO Class 5- section within
the Low-Risk Level CSPs section)
-
The storage and beyond use times for attached
and activated (closures punctured allowing contact of contents)
of these proprietary packaging systems of drug products for
intravascular administration (e.g., ADD-Vantage® and Mini-Bag
Plus®) are those stated in the FDA-approved labeling of
their manufacturers.
|
SINGLE-DOSE
AND MULTIPLE-DOSE CONTAINERS
(after the High-Risk Level CSPs section)
-
Opened or needle-punctured single-dose containers
shall be used within one hour if opened in worse than ISO Class
5 air quality (see Immediate Use Exemption from ISO Class 5-
under Low-Risk Level CSPs), and any remaining contents must
be discarded. Single-dose vials continuously exposed to ISO
Class 5 or cleaner air may be used up to six hours after initial
needle puncture. Opened single-dose ampuls shall not be stored
for any time period.
-
The beyond use date for opened or entered (e.g.,
needle-punctured) multiple-dose containers is 28 days, unless
otherwise specified by the manufacturer.[USP <51> Antimicrobial
Effectiveness Testing requires no testing beyond 28 days, and
USP chapters, i.e., <797>, must refer to other USP chapters,
i.e., <51>, when possible. Manufacturers' expiration dates
apply to properly stored, unopened or unentered containers.
Despite receipt of several external comments referring to a
30-day CDC limit, a careful search of CDC documents by SCC members
did not locate any specific time limit] .
-
Combining multiple-dose and single-dose sterile
products or CSPs for use as multiple-dose applications is prohibited.
|
HAZARDOUS DRUGS
(after the SINGLE-DOSE AND MULTIPLE-DOSE CONTAINERS section)
-
This new section addresses safety
precautions and practices when hazardous drugs (e.g., those
that can cause abortion, allergy, birth defects, blisters, burns,
cancer, cytotoxicity, genetic damage, infertility, irritation,
sensitivity, vital organ toxicity, or other adverse effects)
are ingredients in CSPs. It refers to applicable state and federal
guidelines and standards, and NIOSH Publication No. 2004-165
at www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2004-165/ for safe practices. This
section refers PET compounding to USP <823>, and it contains
a statement about safe practices for all other radioactive sterile
compounding. [Currently official <797> requires positive
pressure for all sterile compounding, but that is wrong for
compounding radioactive and other hazardous drugs].
|
Surface
Sampling with Sterile Swabs or Nutrient Agar Contact Plates
(this is a new paragraph in the Environmental Monitoring section)
-
The procedure is described in new
text that is not included here, and the sampling frequency is
in Table A. below. Table A. Frequency Intervals for Sampling
Microbial Bioburdens on Surfaces of ISO Class 5 (see Table 1)
Sources and Glove Fingertips of Compounding Personnel According
to Weekly Quantities and Risk Levels of CSPs. CSPs per Week
per ISO Class 5 Sourcea Minimum Interval Between Sampling
| CSPs per Week per ISO Class 5 Source |
Minimum Interval Between Sampling |
| Low-Risk and Medium-Risk Levels |
High-Risk Level |
Surfaces i ISO Class 5 Sources a,b |
Fingertips of Gloves |
| Fewer than 100 |
0 |
Six months |
Six months |
| 101 to 300 |
1-2 |
Three months |
Three months |
| More than 300 |
3 and more |
One month |
One month |
aFor example, each
LAFW and barrier isolator.
bUse a separate contact plate or swab for one bottom,
one side, and one upper surface location.
|
Physical
Inspection (add second paragraph)
- Direct visual inspection of highly radioactive
CSPs is not required based on maintaining radiation exposures
As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA).
|
STORAGE
AND BEYOND-USE DATING (add last sentence)
- Technetium-99m/Molybdenum 99 generator systems
shall be stored and eluted (operated) under conditions recommended
by their manufacturers and applicable state and federal regulations.
|
| |
Table
2. Revised Standards and Clarifications Proposed for USP Chapter
<797>.
|
INTRODUCTION
- (first paragraph)
Sterile compounding pertains to all pre-administration
manipulations of CSPs, including compounding, storage, and transport,
but not to administration of CSPs to patients.
- (second paragraph)
Sterile compounding differs from nonsterile
compounding primarily by requiring the maintenance of sterility
when compounding exclusively with sterile ingredients and components,
and the achievement of sterility when compounding with unsterile
ingredients and components.
- indented item
a.)
Use of sterile products is not subject to
<797> unless their preparation, packaging, and storage deviates
from their product package inserts, or their preparation requires
sterilization (i.e., involves a high-risk level component).
- (indented
item c.)
Otics are excluded, and "aqueous" is added before "inhalations"
in the list of preparations required to be sterile before dispensing
and administration to patients.
|
CSP
MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION RISK LEVELS(third paragraph)
- The pre-administration storage durations and temperature
limits apply in the absence of results from (1) sterility testing,
or (2) appropriate repeated or routine simulation testing, e.g.,
adequate media-fill tests or CSPs prepared identically with Soybean-Casein
Digest Medium (see Sterility Tests <71>), that justifies
longer storage durations for specific CSPs prepared in specific
ISO Class 5 (see Table 1) sources by specific personnel.
|
Medium-Risk
Conditions-(condition 5)
- Refrigerated storage is 9 days [The extension
from 7 to 9 days was granted after request from home infusion
pharmacists who ship refrigerated TPN. This is the only proposed
revision that is not based on increasing patient safety by either
standards or clarifying text].
|
Exposure
of Sterile Critical Sites
(new first paragraph of this section currently titled Critical Site
Exposure)
- Shall not exceed one hour in worse than
ISO Class 5 [see Immediate Use Exemption from ISO Class 5- in
Table 1.]
|
ISO
Class 5 Air Sources, Clean Room, Buffer Zone, and Anteroom
(first paragraph of this section currently titled Clean Rooms and
Barrier Isolators)
- A clean room is a compounding environment that
is supplied with high efficiency particulate air (HEPA), or HEPA-
filtered air that meets ISO Class 7.[The current ISO 8 is deemed
too dangerously dirty by some attendees at the 2004 USP workshops,
and by the SCC when considering the following two prudent sources:
- FDA's Current Guidance for Industry Sterile
Drug Products Produced by Aseptic Processing — Current
Good Manufacturing Practice (www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/5882fnl.htm),
which states "FDA recommends that the area immediately
adjacent to the aseptic processing line meet, at a minimum,
Class 10,000 (ISO 7) standards ... under dynamic conditions.
An area classified at a Class 100,000 (ISO 8) air cleanliness
level is appropriate for less critical activities (e.g., equipment
cleaning)."
- "Understanding Pharmaceutical Cleanroom Design,"
a paper by John Zang, a professional engineer, in the September
2004 issue of the ASHRAE Journal (American Society of Heating,
Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. At the following
website is an abstract and reprint order process:http://resourcecenter.ashrae.org/store/ashrae/newstore.cgi?
itemid=22628&view=item&categoryid=894&categoryparent=894&page=1&loginid=1407422.
This paper states "A Typical ISO 7 (Class 10,000) Cleanroom
... using 99.97% HEPA filters ... has a supply airchange rate
approximately 30 per hour."]
(second
paragraph of this section currently titled Clean Rooms and Barrier
Isolators)
- Placement of objects and devices not essential
to compounding in buffer zones and clean rooms is dictated by
their measured effect on the required environmental quality of
air atmospheres and surfaces.
|
Placement
of LAFWs and Barrier Isolators Within ISO Class 7 Buffer Zones or
Areas
(second paragraph of this section currently titled Clean Rooms and
Barrier Isolators)
- Barrier isolators are located, operated, and used
according to manufacturers' recommendations.
|
Cleaning
and Sanitizing the Sterile Compounding Areas
(first paragraph of this section currently titled Cleaning and Sanitizing
the Workspaces)
- 70% Isopropyl Alcohol, IPA, is not required to
be sterile [Neither is it prohibited from being sterile].
- IPA used to sanitize gloves, surfaces, and critical sites shall
remain at least 30 seconds before such materials are contacted
to prepare CSPs.
|
Personnel
Cleansing and Garbing
(second paragraph of this section currently titled Personnel Cleansing
and Gowning)
- The sequence is to don non-shedding coats, gowns,
or coveralls; head and facial hair covers; face masks; and shoe
covers. Then, hands and arms to the elbows are thoroughly scrubbed
with an antiseptic cleanser (e.g., povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine
gluconate; refer to Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings at www.cdc.gov/handhygiene/).
|
FINISHED
PREPARATION RELEASE CHECKS AND TESTS
(first paragraph)
- Sterility testing is required for all high-risk
level CSPs for central nervous or vascular system, intra-articular,
and ophthalmic administration that are prepared in groups more
than 25 identical containers, or exposed longer than 12 hours
to 20 to 80, or longer than 6 hours to warmer than 80 before being
sterilized [These four routes of administration offer the least
natural host immune defense against infections. The time limits
are intended to minimize the shedding of endotoxins from Gram
negative bacilli.]
- Bacterial endotoxin (pyrogen) testing is required
for all high-risk level CSPs for central nervous and vascular
systems, and intra-articular administration under the same above
conditions.
|
References
1. Newton DW, Trissel LA. A Primer on USP Chapter <797> "Pharmaceutical
Compounding — Sterile Preparations," and USP Process for
Drug and Practice Standards. Int J Pharm Compounding. 2004; 8:251-63.
2. U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc. U.S. Pharmacopeia 27. Chapter
<797> Pharmaceutical Compounding — Sterile Preparations.
Rockville, MD: U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc.; 2003: 2350-2370.
3. U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc. U.S. Pharmacopeia 28. Chapter
<797> Pharmaceutical Compounding — Sterile Preparations.
Rockville, MD: U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc.; 2004: 2461-2477.
Footnote
aEach annual USP is copyrighted the year before it becomes official.
For example, USP 28 is copyrighted in 2004, but it is official from
January 1 through December 31 of 2005.
|